Taking
Stock Questions
1.
I
went about the texts by first looking at what was actually presented by them.
Looking at the images and text mainly. I was very critical about them and as I
inferred more I ended up getting deeper and deeper into them.
2.
I
initially started with understanding the ads completely first. I then put those
main ideas in the draft and then connected them all after that.
3.
I
think I organized it pretty well. If anything I could’ve probably used simpler
words in some instances.
4.
Yes,
I provided a large deal of evidence per each point presented.
5.
I
think I connected abstract ideas and hidden ideals presented by the ads very
well.
6.
I
could have probably added more to each explanation in some cases.
7.
I
used three visuals and they were all very key in my explanations. Words alone
couldn’t portray the same thing the ad does in itself because of how heavily I
analyzed them in some cases.
8.
It
made me want to go deeper and deeper into the ads the more and more responses I
got because everyone said it was intriguing.
9.
I
would maybe choose ads next time that their meanings and objectives weren’t so
deeply hidden.
10. I am very pleased
with the result of my analysis. It taught me a lot about just exactly how phone
advertisements have evolved and how they go about their goals in their own ways
and I would definitely delve more into these ads once they come about.
11. I can take away
the ways I used to grab peoples attentions by using rhetorical questions and
leaving a moving closing statement.
No comments:
Post a Comment